1. We've been a little overwhelmed with the rate of moderator activity lately, and @rigel drew the short straw. Congratudolences are appreciated, or you could give generously to the memorial fund for his sanity.
    Dismiss Notice

Some comments on vagueblogging

Discussion in 'That's So Meta!' started by seebs, Oct 27, 2018.

  1. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    Somehow we've ended up with a widespread perception that site policy is you can talk shit about anyone you want if you don't actually give their name.

    This is not a policy.

    The reality is, we don't always have the time to track everything down, we don't read every post, so if something isn't reported, we may never notice it. And sometimes it's hard to tell what things are about. Personal insults are, in fact, still potentially a problem. Note, we don't actually have a general rule against "personal insults". Context is a thing! So are judgment calls!

    But the perception that anything you say is fine as long as you didn't name names? No. This is not how things are intended to work.

    And to put it more directly: If you think that "didn't name names" makes a post okay, but you don't think it would be accepted otherwise, it's probably still actually being a jerk, and even if we don't get involved, you should maybe think about why you feel like you need to do that.
     
    • Agree x 8
    • Like x 1
    • Winner x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice