Reporting the mods

Discussion in 'That's So Meta!' started by Athol Magarac, Oct 24, 2018.

  1. Birdy

    Birdy so long

    if that had happened, i can understand why you would be distressed and feel like it was unfair. but that's not what happened

    my understanding is:
    • you said something bigoted
    • people pointed out to you it was bigoted (some more politely and some less politely)
    • you tried to argue with their explanations and said more bigoted things in the process
    • people stopped being willing to engage with you because you didn't seem willing to learn, and you were rude and spiteful when corrected
    it really isn't a case where you said a single thing and everyone decided you were evil and bad forever. i know that you may feel that way, and i know that it's distressing. i personally am very afraid of other people thinking i'm a bad person and will vociferously defend my morality.

    but that's not what's happening. you've displayed bigotry in multiple comments about multiple groups of people. are people now interpreting more things you say as bigoted? yes, because you've shown, repeatedly and consistently, that you say bigoted things and you hold bigoted views.

    people are also less inclined to be charitable because you double down on your views when questioned, you turn nasty and insulting when people draw attention to your bad behavior, and you've also demonstrated very little ability to even understand what's been said to you.

    some of the most kind and patient people on this forum have written you off almost entirely because communicating with you is as confusing and frustrating for them as it is for you.

    if you want to try to fix your reputation,
    • make a good-faith effort to not say bigoted things
    • avoid contentious topics you don't fully understand
    • do not insult, threaten, or otherwise be an asshole towards people who try to explain things
    • be less nasty, petty, rude and spiteful in general, both towards other forumgoers and to people you discuss in the abstract (like minority groups)
    • make at least some effort to understand why people are so frustrated and angry with you
    • do that less
     
    • Agree x 10
  2. Snitchanon

    Snitchanon What's a mod to a nonbeliever.

    Truly, only the most galaxy-brained “why are people being mean to me, I just want to publically be a bigot in peace” takes for Kintsugi.
     
    • Agree x 2
    • Winner x 1
  3. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    I'm sure this^^ applies, but regardless

    10. (X) Taking back the apology for blaming me for self-harm, again blaming me for how much she drinks
     
    • Witnessed x 4
  4. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    OMFG, I got screamed at for agreeing that you weren't to blame. People wouldn't even tell me what they thought I was saying. If I do a good thing, don't scream at me like I'm horrible.
     
  5. Lizardlicks

    Lizardlicks Friendly Neighborhood Lizard

    Where did this happen.
     
    • Agree x 5
  6. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    1. That's not what happened. Reread the history. Given how many times you misunderstood what I was referring to with 'lies', and especially given that you freely admit you don't get what people were saying, consider that you may in fact be misunderstanding what people were getting angry over.
    2. This whole approach makes the sincerity of those apologies highly suspect in the first place.
    3. It doesn't matter if you're being sarcastic or not, blaming someone else for your self-harm continues to not be okay.
     
    • Witnessed x 4
  7. TheOwlet

    TheOwlet A feathered pillow filled with salt and science

    Seems to be a wiggled post
     
    • Informative x 1
  8. Erica

    Erica occasionally vaguely like a person

    I believe she means people being upset about this:
    ...but, Athol,
    ^this statement is just factually incorrect. People did tell you what they thought you were saying. They explained exactly why what you said was upsetting:

     
    • Agree x 9
  9. Hallowed

    Hallowed praise the sun

    Reminder that help is available
     
    • Witnessed x 4
    • Agree x 1
  10. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    • you said something bigoted without knowing that it was bigoted
    • people pointed out to you it was bigoted (some more politely and some less politely) without explaining why
    • you tried to argue with their explanations insistence that the literal thing was untrue and said more bigoted things in the process (1)
    • people stopped being willing to engage with you because you didn't seem willing to learn, and you were rude and spiteful when corrected You know that thing where I kept screaming at Spock that they were pissing me off and everyone else said "They're being nice"? It goes both ways. I'm being nice and people are screaming at me like I insulted their mother.

    if you want to try to fix your reputation,
    • make a good-faith effort to not say bigoted things Kinda hard when I can't keep "good words" and "bad words" straight. People also can't see to agree on them, or they're changing every time I look.
    • avoid contentious topics you don't fully understand That might exacerbate the problem. Like right now, everything I know about incels comes from a hate-sub.
    • do not insult, threaten, or otherwise be an asshole towards people who try to explain things I think this is a tone-problem because I've been nice. I'm afraid to agree with someone because sofar I've just gotten screamed at for my trouble.
    • be less nasty, petty, rude and spiteful in general, both towards other forumgoers and to people you discuss in the abstract (like minority groups) Yes mam, I will do everything you say even if I don't understand it mam.
    • make at least some effort to understand why people are so frustrated and angry with you Maybe the reason is that they read things the opposite of what they should? I've asked for people to put more effort into making sure we're on the same page.
    • do that less


    (1) Bear with me because I know people hate it when I try metaphors. Imagine someone like Sheldon Cooper. If someone says "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush," he might start arguing that the objective value of a bird doesn't depend on its location, unless you were talking about regional bird markets, but hand and bush aren't really objective locations.
     
  11. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    No, it's the things you say about something existing that looks bigoted. And I don't think you're being misread. I think you're rejecting what people say because it seems too weird to you, and deciding they must have meant something else.

    It's definitely not the case that "everything you say will be viewed as a bigoted thing". It's that you keep saying things which... Okay, so, I am not great at race politics. I sometimes have to ask friends to help me understand things, or explain why something would upset people. And you keep saying things I am unwilling to show those people because it would hurt them. And these are people who know me, know that I'm just shy of biologically incapable of the kind of bigotry they're bothered by, and are used to helping me understand race-related social questions.
     
    • Agree x 2
  12. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    How about this... Jews and Hollywood, what is okay and what isn't?

    I tried explaining my takeaway on what I thought people were saying and it almost sounds like I heard bigoted things coming from here.
     
  13. Lizardlicks

    Lizardlicks Friendly Neighborhood Lizard

    Got it. Athol feel free to correct. Let me try to highlight

    Good!

    Bad. This is the part that is being objected to.
     
    • Agree x 6
    • Winner x 2
  14. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    (Dropping most of the points because Athol likes posts focused on fewer topics.)

    Already pointed out: That qualifier is irrelevant.

    False. Multiple people explained why, in simple and clear language.

    You keep saying you're being nice. You're not. You may be intending niceness compared to how you feel, but you are not being nice by any standard I can conceive of. You are being directly, openly, abusive towards multiple people.
     
    • Agree x 8
  15. Lizardlicks

    Lizardlicks Friendly Neighborhood Lizard

    Jews do not control the media or even a majority of it. Saying so is a dogwhistle for anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. There are a few famous people in media who are also Jewish. Feel free to consume media produced by them.
     
    • Agree x 7
  16. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    What do you think pushing my buttons means?
     
  17. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    Lashing out, which is how you've repeatedly described your own actions, is by definition not-nice.

    This isn't even touching on the threats of sending me videos of your self-harming, which is not """nice""" under any circumstances whatsoever.

    And nobody has been calling me nice, me included. I've been very open that yes, I'm not being gentle and I am expressing negative emotions.

    Now. History and facts.

    People never disagreed with you saying I want nice. You accused me of going off the deep end, flying off the handle, and having a screaming meltdown. THAT is what people were disagreeing with.

    I clarified just yesterday, again, that I am completely out of patience for the way your emotions overwrite history to make me a convenient villain. Check. Your. FACTS.
     
    • Witnessed x 4
  18. Snitchanon

    Snitchanon What's a mod to a nonbeliever.

    Tough. It's still bigoted.

    Yes, we have explained why, at great length.

    No, those were explanations.

    This metaphor is terrible and I have no idea what it means.

    HAHAHAHA.
    No.
    You really aren't.

    No they're not. Yelling in this thread is minimal, and you taking everything as a very personal attack is on you.

    The things you keep saying have been unacceptable since, well, the fifties at least.

    See above for laughter.

    You really haven't been screamed at.

    Stop taking the piss.

    And now you're demanding that people do homework for you.
    Stop that, too.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2018
    • Agree x 3
    • Winner x 2
  19. KingStarscream

    KingStarscream watch_dogs walking advertisement

    Given your upbringing and the fact that you feel the need to argue with everyone who tries to explain it to you, I think a blanket "do not talk about Jewish people in Hollywood, in any capacity, because it always swings back around to the 'controlling the media' aspect that's born from antisemitic conspiracies and is provably untrue."

    Even if you think 'that would be a good thing'. Fullstop. Don't bring it up. Don't argue in favor of your perspective that they dominate Hollywood. Don't reference Jewish control of anything, because by your own admission, you come from a background with extreme bigotry, and your upbringing and socialization is not a reliable source of information that isn't antisemitic.

    Literally no one is saying 'you can't consume media made by people in minority groups', all we've said is 'stop parroting white supremacist conspiracy theories'.
     
    • Agree x 17
  20. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    It doesn't matter. The problem is the "as a result of her [doing something]". You're blaming her for something you're doing. That is generally abusive, and never nice.
     
    • Agree x 3
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice