Not a reasonable request when you continue to talk about her. "Would have." >Asks spock to go away >Proceeds to talk about her again And, at least part of the reason people bring Spock up is because you are avoiding apologising because you cannot admit your own fault in anything ever* *without 'woe-is-me' pity-seeking hyperbole, that is. Most people on this forum understand what spoon theory is, and yet you continue to be incomprehensible.
That situation, I got angry and frustrated. (Still confused on if other people can cause emotions through their actions.) I broke the rule of "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all" % I let the frustration that I bottled up about that situation pop directly at the cause. No matter how out-of-control I feel, I am at fault for losing control. & I am at fault for typing out a not-nice thing when I had no clue that there was a right way and a wrong way to say it. I'm very at-fault because there was no accident in hitting "send" & To dial this back, if someone tosses me a wool sweater, I am at-fault if I jerk away like I've been burned. I have gone through many beatings in an effort to train me not to react to things that don't bother normal people. % This is a shitty abusive rule, but realizing that probably led to the "please stop" exploit.
Other people can cause things to happen, but it isn't necessarily their fault. Yeah, that wasn't an acceptable reaction. And wait... Yeah, this here is saying that Spock was the 'cause' of your utterly unacceptably awful behaviour. Right. Here. You are literally in this very sentence blaming someone else for what you did. The multiple horrible things you did. The multiple horrible things you did and yet still are incapable of apologising for. 'Fault' isn't necessarily what makes sense here. Try 'responsibility'. Yes you are. How is sending Spock graphic threats and then adding more graphic threats something that any creature with an intelligence greater than a sea cucumber would conclude as "oh I didn't know how to phrase it properly". How is there any ambiguity at all. Yep. Absolutely. This is not a comparable situation at all. You. Sent. Graphic. Threats. Directed. At. Spock. It is not comparable, even by analogy, to aversion to contact with woollen fabric.
I was meaning to come back to that. The conclusion I drew was that Spock was a more-than. While an equal can request non-communication or even digitally enforce it without given notice like I've done with Vivec and pencil-drawing guy, mods are above us so that even asking one to not communicate is overstepping one's station. I guess Chiomi leaving me alone and breaking the silence with a request to have the silence stop was an indulgence or they had their own desire for some distance.
You keep lying about Spock, and Spock is not obligated to take that lying down. This has been explained umpteen times.
This will never end. You cannot make me stop. Your actions are unconscionable and you are unrepentant. You can step away, but I will always be here if I can be bothered to engage with you, which is not often.
It should be pretty clear that this social hierarchy is not actually in effect, because if I wad a more-than, you never would gave been allowed to lie about me so many times or say those other delightful graphic things to/about me. This is right on the first page of the thread. If you were being silenced, none of this would have been published. Stop trying to do gotchas based on bad premises, it's getting real old.
.... Is time counted by exchanges or actual time? I think I woke up to her "absolutely not" and I think I'm at least at 6 hours lately.
lol nope. I'm a bit fuzzy on actual details but I believe there's other people who have requested not being interacted with from certain mods and have been granted this request. The difference tends to be those people are more than happy to just mutually ignore eachother and do not use this request as a way to bad mouth people in public without them being able to respond. So like maybe think about that for a bit.
Time is counted in time, except by you, because you like to think the horrible things you did and continue to refuse to apologise properly for were "ages ago" despite the fact that this has mostly happened over a few weeks.
I was talking about Neshomeh or however it's spelled. I'm trying to actively wipe her name from my memory.
good idea! then you can ignore the new, split off thread forever (even better, hope that people somehow forget in that time), and stop discussion of things you cant figure out how to spin.
I don't care It's unacceptable either way You've made identical arguments about Spock I don't care Have I mentioned how little I care?
Wait, I kinda stopped reading the post where Spock thought my sock-account quip was serious. Did they admit to being Jove?
Given the fantastically dumb things I've seen you state as fact, you don't have a leg to stand on here. And you follow this up with an eye-wateringly brainless statement, so that proves my point. Once more, complaining about us not explaining things is really stupid if you don't read what we say.
This is old news, but does that includde Vivec bad-mouthing me in his vent last summer and telling me to not be there at all? I think I was making general statements about mods and Spock took it personally when I was in "treat you all as robed mystery-figures" mode. I think I did ask Spock to use a translator once I started overreacting to a tone-disfunction and again when we realizeddd that it was a tone-dysfunction.
Ugh, I suppose asking Snitch to stop twisting the knife would be met with some sort of "how dare you" ?
(Disclaimer: I'm talking about this mostly because I find it an interesting topic, but hey, I wouldn't mind getting some blood from that stone.) It's a topic with a great deal of nuance, but in general I'd break it down into three categories: Bullying/abuse/antagonism: One person is clearly exerting effort to upset another one. In this case the active person would be 'in the wrong' and bare some responsibility for the upset, but not the actions of the person being abused (with the exception of actions taken in self defense or to escape). Enforcing boundaries: A person has a right to decide who they will associate with, the opinions they hold, control of their body, control of their things, ect. Even if they know enforcing these boundaries will cause another person distress, they have every right to do so, and don't bare any kind of responsibility for the distress. Triggers (for lack of a better word): Sometimes, people do things and they cause all sorts of reactions that there is no way to predict. I'll just give an example from my life: My aunt texted me to say she would miss seeing me for Thanksgiving very much, and she's looking forward to Christmas. The reason we aren't getting together is something completely out of our control, completely, 100%. I still felt horrendously guilty when I got that text, because my brain is an asshole like that. Is my aunt responsible for me feeling guilty? Of course not! There is no way she'd have been able to predict I'd feel like that, and her text was actually very sweet. When I was able to step back and calm down, I now appreciate getting it. I'd very much like to hear other people's thoughts on this, because it's something I've had to work on myself.