Reporting the mods

As in Spock's TCHGB thread, when we tell you you're misrepresenting the truth, we cite sources.

 

No, what we are saying is that you are threatening us. Me in particular.
While it's impossible for you to cause me to feel any emotion at all, this is still unacceptable, because you are trying to threaten me into not criticising you.

 

That reads as "if you don't stop telling me I'm wrong, I'll tell you to google [something]".
Which is a threat.

I did not ignore that.
In fact, I posted a response.

The way you feel is valid, but the fact you claim isn't true.
I'm not baiting you to do anything.

 

If you accuse me of something and then refuse to read my reply, this becomes a you problem.

 

You know, considering how often youve been deliberately sexually inappropriate at people on here, and given that you've offered/threatened to send nsfw photos and nsfl videos to multiple people on this site already

I have a real hard time believing that you don't know that 'I hate my tub, but here's a picture of a beaver ;)' sounds like you're posting nudes.

You didn't get a full explanation, because you were busy arguing that calling trans folks 'the trans' is justified because pronoun trouble, even though the term 'trans people' has been offered up to you multiple times before.

I would,say something about how you hate it when people assume things about your motivations but do it incessantly to other people, but i already know that when that happens you break out the 'NO U' defense and say you're just imitating everything else, which isn't a convincing argument, but it sure is tedious and repetitive

 

Somehow i dont think that was the someone else you were hoping for, but hey.

 

Untrue. This was exactly what you were trying to do.

 

Golden rule doesn't work on me.

 

You are saying you want to do Y because of X as a way of threatening Y unless X stops.
This is not negotiable. That is literally what you are saying and it has connotations of a threat.

Tough.

What does 'take responsibility' even mean in this context.
As I am posting these publicly, my responsibility for them is implicit.

I cannot be hurt. Athol can.
Thus, treating her as I would theoretically want to be treated would be very unfair.

 

It is literally what the words you are saying mean, to be more precise. And I don't lie.

 

If the magazine makes you want to do things, you can... close the magazine.
And also, the example you give isn't comparable to the implicit threats you've been making against me.

No.
Kathy is going through every thread you have in the Pear Wiggler and commenting, as she said she would, as to whether she'd have wiggled it herself.
This is probably why you're getting some kind of 'flooding' message.