Reporting the mods

@Snitchanon Athol has previously expressed discomfort with reaction images, I'm sure you didn't mean to diregard that (reasonable) boundary, so here's a gentle reminder and I'll bounce right back out :>

 

This is a huge part of why people come to the conclusion that you are not responding in good faith. This comes off as very sarcastic. You are being petty, rude and spiteful in response to helpful comments telling you not to do that very thing.

#lessonsinwhatnottodo

 

Work with me, will you?

 

This is actually just literally untrue. The initial thread on the topic was full of people really politely explaining why what you said was an antisemetic conspiracy theory dogwhistle.

The fact that none of it sunk in after dozens of pages of people trying to politely explain why your statements were bigoted is why we're at where we're at

 

There is nothing here to work with. You are responsible for your own actions. Spock did not tell you to self harm, did not suggest you self harm, does not want you to self harm. You choosing to self harm is your choice. She is not to blame, even if you are upset with her.

 

Like, the fact that you seem to constantly attempt to re-tell history in a way that makes you a victim of bullying and harassment when we literally have hard evidence to the contrary kinda makes it hard to engage with you as a good-faith actor.

 

Now I'm really fucking confused. Just full dream-logic doesn't make sense.

I caught Snitch's image, and according to my explanation, it should be fine.

 

Hi, sorry, I have problems with people flooding out the important things. Thanks for the poke and I'll get right to it.

 

Yeah uh, I kinda gotta agree with Snitch here?

I don't remember anything about you explaining that certain reaction images are fine or what precisely about them upsets you?

I mean I fully admit I could've just missed it, I'm not all-knowing, but

as far as I remember the latest mutually agreed upon point on that topic was
'Athol has expressed discomfort with reaction images. Therefore we will try to avoid using reaction images to make communication easier and not cause harm.'

 

i cant find the post but im pretty sure she said the reason is she often has trouble interpreting the meaning of the image and wouldnt mind if she could understand what the image was meant to convey

 

1) I was feeling a bit low, and we still haven't cleared up serophobia vs hating one person. It just sort of went away. I don't think I got a reply to my risk-taking idea.

2) Accepted. Can I have the same courtesy in letting me explain when things aren't a deliberate slight?

3) What I was looking for was a bit of padding. But yeah, it won't help much with what's been going on. That's a thing that's going to need to be untandled more.

4) Yeah, I'll try for less heavy stuff. I'm not saying I won't slip up though. Like. there's a really heavy message in Boss Baby that kinda explains a lot of the phobics and isms.

 

Bingo. It was in a reply to Allyssa, right after we determined that reaction images were arousing me. Notice that I'm the one who started the Batman exchange, but the only part of it I understood was the Dory part, which is pretty much what I expected.

What I don't understand is that people are okay that I complained about how the reaction images made me feel, but I get called a liar for saying how Spock talking to me made me feel.