Reporting the mods

Discussion in 'That's So Meta!' started by Athol Magarac, Oct 24, 2018.

  1. Kathy

    Kathy Well-Known Member

    That isn't rubbing your face in anything, it's pointing out the actual chain of factual events, a thing you've specifically shown and said you have trouble keeping track of.

    You have not apologized. And that is severely fucked up. I don't think the conversation should progress until you have made it clear that you understand your threatening behavior was wrong and can promise to try not to do it again.
     
    • Agree x 12
  2. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    An apology doesn't obligate people to forgive you, and very much doesn't obligate them to forget the events happened. And apologies don't buy you future credit for making the same mistakes. There is no reset button like that.
     
    • Agree x 12
  3. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    Yeah, you're really selling me on the "go through a humiliation and give us something new to mock you about"

    The fallout from trying to apologize feels like a kick in the teeth, and now you're saying that there's no upside?

    I'd rather come to terms again with how I'm still the same unwanted freak I was back in highschool and I am going to die miserable no matter what I do.
     
  4. IvyLB

    IvyLB Hardcore Vigilante Gay Chicken Facilitator

    I don't think you understand the function of an apology very well.
    It's not a 'make people stop bothering me' button
    Apologies should be about not wanting to do harm, and communicating regret for doing it accidentally.
    You classifying them as 'humiliation' really just sounds like you consider other people's pain secondary to you being inconvenienced.
    Which would be pretty fucked up.
     
    • Agree x 19
  5. TheOwlet

    TheOwlet A feathered pillow filled with salt and science

    Yeah. an apology is about the other person, and their pain, and only about you in so far as that you caused that pain. It's function is to clarify that 1) you're sorry for causing pain 2) you'll do your best not to do it again.

    It's not always pleasant, but that's a side effect of it, not the primary function. People aren't asking you for an apology because they want to humiliate you. Nobody here wants that. They're asking for an apology to make you understand that the things you said were not ok, and need addressing, and need at the very least verbal amends.
     
    • Agree x 17
  6. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    Then how about Spock shows me how it is done?

    I was very hurt when Spock kept talking to me after I told them not to. I'm now trying to embrace how it's all my fault that they kept doing it because they insisted I was lying when I was just trying to express what was bothering me. I'm trying to embrace that it's my fault that I chose to feel emotions and be hurt by their actions. It's just like in High School where if I expressed that something was bothering me, they'd giggle and keep doing it until I got too worn-down to feel anything.
     
  7. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    Yeah, the thing is that I'm not sorry. I don't have regrets about engaging when you talked about me. An apology is supposed to happen because you have regrets about what you did, not just because the other person wants one. I'm not saying empty apology words that I don't mean.

    And who knows how deliberate this is, but you're really presenting this as a power move, where you're still angry at me and want to ~put me in my place~. You've expressed multiple times that you think apologizing is 'humiliating'. You have tried so goddamn many ways to force me into behaving the way you want, and the tactics have gotten overtly abusive multiple times (again, threats of videos of self-harm, which you see no problem with), and just because it's not THAT bad here doesn't mean this is an okay pattern, so yeah, hell no.

    Plus, here's the obligatory correction that I was engaging to correct things you said about me that were provably wrong, which I'm sure you're going to ignore. Another reason why I'm not actually sorry for doing it, because you still can't seem to process what the problem even was to begin with.
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2018
    • Agree x 13
    • Winner x 2
  8. Kathy

    Kathy Well-Known Member

    Athol. Stop it.

    It is not spock's fault. Spock gave you extremely clear instructions and a boundary. An incredibly reasonable one of "stop lying about what happened and I'll stop talking to you." She would have stopped talking to you if you had stopped lying.

    It sucks that you felt distress and your emotions are real but Spock doesn't need to apologize because you kept lying about her and she refused to let it stand. This is not a Both Sides situation.

    I have shown you an apology when I apologized for losing my temper at you. You said you were gonna keep that on record for reference. Maybe pull that back up.
     
    • Agree x 12
  9. Wretched and Vile

    Wretched and Vile A very bad person

    Just watching this like, I just don't know if Athol can actually grasp the things she's done that are wrong and hurt people, and that she's just trying to use apologies as a means to get people to stop, and failing spectacularly at wording any of her apologies

    And if she's just trying to do apologies to get people to stop, then I don't think there is the sincerity behind the apology that people want.

    Like before Athol can give that kind of apology, there needs to be a whole reframing for understanding people, and she needs professional help for that probably.
     
    • Agree x 4
  10. prismaticvoid

    prismaticvoid Too Too Abstract

    • Agree x 8
  11. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    Yeah, the think is that I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be sorry about. I translate this as advice that I shouldn't say empty apologies about things I don't understand just because the other person wants one. "I'm sorry that you misinterpreted my words and got angry about that?" "I'm sorry that I don't have the ability to simulate a brain I don't have?" I've been told that those are both rubbish apologies when that's as sincere as I can be.

    Yeah, no, I'm just trying to figure things out. Could you stop reading the wrong cypher; or whatever the hell phrasing won't set you off?

    And then I decided to budge a little. I guess I didn't expect you to budge from your POV to adopt mine. I honestly can say that I didn't have a plan, I can't honestly say whether I would have followed examples to make you feel like shit as an add-on to the beratement for the original slight, or if I would have been true to one of the metal rules in actually treating your apology the way I would want my apologies to be treated.

    Not you personally, but that's what moderation feels like.

    Image reaction... there's this clip from Black Beauty TV adaptation... in the book he describes why this one particular posture-harness is so horrible, and his drawing-partner freaks out because she thinks her neck will snap. I was looking for an animation from the 80's, but this is pretty close to what I remember. Longer freak-out balanced by someone actually stepping in and breaking the tension.

    The problem is that I let myself get desperate enough to resort to those threats. I apologize for not weathering the storm of your continued provoking. I should have gray-rocked you, but I made the mistake of being emotionally vulnerable. I'll try to keep in mind that escalating the emotional reaction does nothing but titillate the provoker.

    And I got tired... poke me if there was anything I missed.
     
  12. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    The point.
     
    • Witnessed x 8
    • Winner x 1
  13. Kathy

    Kathy Well-Known Member

    This is bullshit and it's fucked up and I've told you why before.

    No.

    No.

    It was never acceptable to threaten that. Never ever. You weren't being "emotionally vulnerable" you were being controlling and abusive.

    Stop it.
     
    • Agree x 14
  14. Kathy

    Kathy Well-Known Member

    Also I'll say again - spock did not provoke you. it is not her fault that you react badly to her trying to be nice. you had previously yelled at her for being short with you. it sounds like you are trying to silence her because you feel bad despite the fact that you are being severely abusive.

    spock did not provoke you. spock did nothing to deserve what you did and continue to do to her.
     
    • Agree x 15
    • Winner x 2
    • Like x 1
  15. Re Allyssa

    Re Allyssa Sylph of Heart

    I understand that you're frustrated and I'm sorry for that. But you're usually being wiggled for 1) continuing to say things that hurt people, especially after people have told you they are hurtful 2) recounting events in a way that differs from what happened so extremely that it could trigger people who have had this done to them on purpose (gaslighting) and 3) general nastiness toward other users or yourself.

    (That probably broadly covers all of your posts.)

    These are things that will hurt other people if they're posted. Post moderation is all about minimizing the hurt done to the forum at large.

    We don't explain as much anymore because when we tried you didn't listen and then started yelling at us.
     
    • Witnessed x 8
    • Agree x 1
    • Informative x 1
  16. spockandawe

    spockandawe soft and woolen and writhing with curiosity

    Just wiggled four posts (+ one post that I think was an accident) replying to miscellaneous posts from this thread. I explained why in the wiggler. Teal deer, she's been warned a lot of times about darvo, gaslighting, and the 'guess I'm subhuman' thing, and these were pretty vicious.

    And since I'm the designated punching bag, before I get accused of ~silencing her~, I argued hard for the posts to be approved, and was outnumbered and overruled. I consistently err in the direction of publishing these sorts of edge cases (and have been criticized for those decisions), but the consensus here was that this kind of language hurts people, even if it's par for the course in this conversation. So I put the posts in the wiggler. I still would have liked people to see how ugly those responses got, but folks have already seen that from her, they don't need more evidence.
     
    • Witnessed x 12
    • Agree x 2
  17. Jove

    Jove [ destination defenestration ]

    Oi vey. All right. Well this certainly became a thing.

    That's an extremely good point to make, and I also don't think I made it very clear that I'm not saying other people shouldn't walk away when progress hasn't been made (gods know everyone should avoid destroying their own health for no or little gain on that front). I'm hopping in this as Johnny Come Lately here, so I don't have any burn out, therefore I don't mind throwing in what I got and letting that be that. Athol is on post mod for a good reason, and people are just fed up for a good reason, I'll never say otherwise.

    I also didn't make it very clear, because I didn't have words for it at the time, that the whole "x people don't ever change" is legitimately triggering for me, and I admittedly don't always respond well to that. That said.

    @Athol Magarac for fuck's sake. Leave it alone and let it go. And yes, I mean you specifically, considering you have been the damn instigator here. Enough is enough.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2018
    • Agree x 6
  18. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    And I do feel completely dehumanized when people just keep poking me and poking me and then telling me it's my fault and that I'm being nasty when they finally get me to snap.
     
  19. Athol Magarac

    Athol Magarac I prefer reading posts without a lot of topics.

    Oh, I also have a severe problem with language. Asking if someone is delusional is giving credit to them for telling what must be the perfectly accurate unbiased truth. I'm sorry for not knowing that, and I'll try to remember to call people delusional when I agree with what they say.
     
  20. Kathy

    Kathy Well-Known Member

    I'm sorry you feel that way, that sucks. However it is really important to note that your requirement that spock not talk to you while you were actively lying - intentionally or not - is unreasonable, especially given that all spock wanted was for you to stop doing that.

    So, let's turn your own thought processes back on you for a second - why are you angry at spock when you kept poking and poking and poking and then telling her it was her own fault and that she was being nasty when she was just asking you to stop, and then dramatically escalating to threatening behaviors, insults and further refusal to stop.

    This isn't a turkey peacock situation anymore, maybe it was in the first two instances of you saying untruths and her asking you to stop, it's not now. It's you being in the wrong. And I'm sorry, I know that sucks to hear, but you're not in the right here.

    If you want spock to leave you alone? Check the facts of your assertions before you post. Don't lie about her. Check the timeline. Don't ping her. Stop holding her responsible for your self harm.

    I'm sorry you feel dehumanized when your insults and such are pointed out, but we'd be doing you a major disservice if we didn't. You've made some lovely posts in my thread, which I deeply appreciate! I know you can care about other people, and I genuinely think you can make friends here but not if you keep doing this stuff.
     
    • Agree x 9
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice