For folks with unreality issues, this is in reference to a different wiggled post from a different thread about a different topic, where I made the mistake of engaging, more than once, to help with why the post was wiggled, and what might help with the problem in the future. Eta: my phrasing is a little unclear, sorry. For clarity, she wasn't called delusional at any point in that conversation. The word was in there, and she's mockingly quoting one of my posts, but nobody in that thread applied the word to her.
You're absolutely not doing yourself any favours here, you're coming off as both completely context free as well as incredibly caustic and snappy.
Originally, it was because I was lashing out against people who were calling me abusive for continuing to talk to liars after the liars wanted me not to. There was a phase where the mods were reading things stronger from me than they would a non-bigot. And the last one was my mistake for thinking that delusional meant "not grounded in reality" when it really means about the opposite.
"And then I was like 'oh jeez, that's me'" (It's too bad that's still not what happened. Repeating falsehoods doesn't ACTUALLY make them true)
Oh, haha, no that was definitely abusive behavior. I was mistaken on who you were referring to, probably because you make NO EFFORT to be clear about who you're talking about. And it's still not what happened, but hey. I got your long-term grudge sniping campaigns mixed up, because calling the ppc liars makes... no sense? no sense.
tbf that doesn't really rule them out though, since quite a lot of what she says fails to track with reality
Ugh, okay, flow interrupted for another wiggled post, because I'm-less-than-human isn't an okay tactic. Which she's been warned about a LOT of times before now, including last night. Her point: Other people can set boundaries where she's wrong for violating them, but it feels like she can't set boundaries where other people are wrong for violating them. I think the main issue is that she's not distinguishing contexts and what are reasonable boundaries and what aren't, but this part of the conversation never seems to progress past that last paragraph's point.
Edit: Oops, ninja'd I think in this case the ambiguity was deliberate. The statement was phrased in such a way to sound like it was about you, to generate a response of "YES it's okay to correct someone's lies about you, even if they don't want you interacting with them," specifically so that she could turn it around and apply it to the situation with the PPC, to prove a point. I think that Athol doesn't see a difference between her sockpuppetting the PPC after being banned, and you continuing to ask her to stop lying about you after she's asked you to go away. In her mind, you are to her what she was to the PPC, and I think she believes that if it's wrong/right in one situation it must be wrong/right in both. (Just trying to translate the thought process. Feel free to correct me if I got it wrong.)
Yes, I think you have it exactly right. I'm out at lunch, but I was trying to figure iut the right way to phrase what felt suspicious about that. The definition of "lie" is something she keeps circling back around to with me, and it's not all that relevant to the ppc grudge. I'm not writing an essay about how how boundaries work, because she ignores those posts and I'm not wasting the effort, but it's a persistent problem.
Not quite. I was phrasing it about the PPC and I guess I got too vague. I was hoping that the conversation would go directly to what the actual difference is.
I know this isn't the first time you've heard this But just imagine Imagine how much easier conversation would be For everyone You included If you just bothered to mention what you're talking about instead of assuming people can read your mind.
Well, is it ever provided as a reason you're being wiggled? Lots of confusing things from you get approved. Things get wiggled for having something clearly inappropriate in them. This might, might have helped in one or two cases, but it is absolutely not one of the major drivers
It depends on the posts! This is not a negotiation. This is a way for you to improve your communication. Which, if the things you are communicating are things that we wouldn't wiggle, will go through.