1. We've been a little overwhelmed with the rate of moderator activity lately, and @rigel drew the short straw. Congratudolences are appreciated, or you could give generously to the memorial fund for his sanity.
    Dismiss Notice

The Xenforo "Discourage" Feature

Discussion in 'That's So Meta!' started by palindromordnilap, May 14, 2018.

  1. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    Kintsugi is acting really buggy for me right now. It takes ages to load, occasionally redirects me to the home page or to about:blank, throws errors, etc. I'm actually not even sure this will go through. It's vaguely like XenForo's discouragement function, but I don't think that's what's actually going on because it's practically a ban, and as far as I can tell we don't do those.
    Interestingly, this only happens to my main account, palindromordnilap. My subaccounts seem to be fine.
     
    • Witnessed x 2
  2. Verily

    Verily invests her cash in stock in Cyber Disney

    Not having that level of problem, but sometimes it’s weird on mobile. It used to bug out a bit if I played a video. Every clickable thing would stop working including links and ratings until I reloaded the page. Now there’s a good chance the same thing will happen if a video is merely present on the page even if I don’t play it.
     
  3. vuatson

    vuatson [delurks]

    Haven’t noticed any other bugs, but on mobile (safari, iOS) kintsugi does load much slower than any other site for me.
     
  4. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    We don't do bans, but I have in the past used discouragement for dealing with trolls and spammers, or in cases where I wanted to nudge someone towards slowing down a bit. In the past couple of days, you've variously harassed, attacked, and generally directed abuse as well as multiple threats of real-life harm towards some number of people (I know of at least seven so far), mostly on discord. When I was on my way to bed, someone mentioned yet another instance of this, plus some threats of additional harm involving downloading private pictures from NSFW stuff. I was really tired and misread that as being about the forum, I didn't have time to do a clever or nuanced thing, so I set the flag that would at least slow it down with intent to get back to it "at some point", such as in the morning or after work or something. Note, the discourage flag was set in response to the harassment I already knew about; the drama did not result from or relate to the use of the discouragement feature, the drama predated the use of the discouragement feature. The ensuing shit-stirring isn't even on the radar compared to the actual bullshit. Which, to be clear, needs to fucking stop.

    A couple of people have expressed a strong preference not to use that feature, so I'm going to stop using that, but I haven't yet figured out what to do for cases where I don't actually particularly want someone Gone, I just want them to fucking chill for a bit and they're unwilling or unable to do so. (And of course, it'd help if I'd have read the thing more carefully and noted the threat was directed at discord, not at the forum.)

    Anyway, no, it's not "practically a ban". It is, however, arguably more annoying than a ban, and as such, I'm dropping it from the set of responses I will generally use.
     
    • Informative x 5
    • Like x 2
  5. unknownanonymous

    unknownanonymous i am inimitable, i am an original|18+

    seebs, i'd like it if you told people that someone was harassing people before you took action. 'cause i had no idea palin was doing that when she posted this here and i got worried 'cause it seemed random and out of nowhere, even knowing palin's history.
     
  6. spockandawe

    spockandawe "YOU KNOW SHE THRIVES ON THE CURSED CONTENT"

    Hey, real quick, just to clear up a potential source of extra confusion before it becomes an issue: Seebs is at the second day of a new job (yesterday was the first), which is part of why the execution and response on the discourage flag were less than ideal, and which may contribute to slow and/or erratic responses today. I can see value in having this conversation, but I'm not sure how actively Seebs is going to be able to participate during the workday until things settle out.
     
    • Informative x 6
    • Useful x 1
  7. unknownanonymous

    unknownanonymous i am inimitable, i am an original|18+

    thank you!

    i'm just upset 'cause i feel like palin deceptively played on my sympathies and like if seebs had told me what palin was doing first, palin wouldn't have been able to play me like that.
     
    • Witnessed x 4
  8. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    In this case, it was the night before first day of new job, it was something like 12:30 AM, and I needed to go to bed, and I was just pushing the "slow the fuck down" button figuring I could deal more coherently later. And I also have some concerns, because in general I don't announce that I'm restricting people's access, or otherwise reducing their ability to harass people. So an announcement that someone's harassing people, with no comment about what if anything I'm doing about it, seems pointless. An announcement that they're harassing people and here's what we're doing is a thing I'd rather not do, in general. And once the meltdown's started, there's nothing I can say that will not be interpreted as Time To Escalate. So I'm not sure what exactly I'd announce, in a case like that. I only commented on the thing because Alix had implied in another thread that the drama was about the use of the discourage feature, but she's been talking about murdering people for, I dunno, a week or so at least? And I wanted to clarify that, no, this wasn't about the use of the discourage feature, the discourage feature was used in response to something that predated it.
     
    • Informative x 2
  9. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    Okay, I'm glad this is not going to get used without the user being informed anymore. I might have done fucked up stuff, but that doesn't warrant breaking that moderation policy. I suspect it was really just because you were mad.
     
  10. unknownanonymous

    unknownanonymous i am inimitable, i am an original|18+

    i'm glad you clarified that the drama wasn't about the use of the discourage feature but i'm bothered by the fact that palin deliberately omitted their harassment of people and i didn't know about 'cause i'm not on the discord and wasn't being harassed and that meant i ended up having more sympathy for palin then they warranted.

    and just, i'm really angry at palin for pulling this shit over me.
     
    • Witnessed x 1
  11. spockandawe

    spockandawe "YOU KNOW SHE THRIVES ON THE CURSED CONTENT"

    I'm not entirely positive, because I don't have a great memory for the specifics of phrasing, but I don't believe there was ever a mod policy put in place for the discouragement flag. I know there's been talk about circumstances for applying post moderation, but I don't recall the conversation extending past those bounds

    (and at my work, I'm limited to mobile and with an accelerating workload, so I can't research and quote particulars right this moment)
     
    • Informative x 4
  12. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    For the record, seebs is being misleading: the "harassing at least seven users" part happened approximately an hour and a half after the event that triggered the discouragement, according to timestamps.
     
  13. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    There was never a policy of any sort about how we do or don't use discouragement. I've been really fucking clear about this: The ultimate policy is that if I think a thing needs to happen to protect people from harm, I'll probably do that thing, and I don't care whether people like it or not.

    There is now a policy that, in general, I won't use discouragement. I might make exceptions if I think there's good reasons to, because I will always make exceptions if I think there's good reasons to.

    And yes, I get that you "suspect" it was really just because I was mad, but I wasn't even actually mad, just tired. You've been talking about murdering people on Discord. At length. Talking about how you want to arrange to make it possible, and so on. That's not some kind of harmless internet japery. You're really, really, fucking far out of line, and now you're trying to spin it as something where your completely ordinary and harmless behaviors are getting these massively disproportionate responses, but no, you're actually escalating significantly beyond what you've done in the past. Oh, and also the threats to try to get someone declared incompetent and returned to their abusive parents, which were super classy of you.

    You aren't even the tiniest bit "the victim" here. You're being abusive to lots of vulnerable people so you can claim I'm "just mad" if I react in a way you don't like, but the thing is, most of this has been happening in places like Discord where you don't have any kind of confidientiality shield, to say nothing of whether I'd consider a confidentiality shield to apply to threats to murder people. (Hint: It doesn't.)

    I get that you want to make everyone finally see that I'm the bad guy, but it turns out that when your strategy is to suicide-bait known suicidal people, try to get people forcibly returned to their abusers, and threaten to kill people, in order to show that I might use an annoying forum feature temporarily and not immediately say I'm doing so, you are not making a persuasive case. To make your case, you have to be doing things less horrible than my responses, not dramatically more horrible than my responses.

    Effective: You insult someone and they beat you up, you say they're horrible and abusive.
    Ineffective: You beat a bunch of people severely enough that they require hospitalization, someone slaps you on the back of the head not even hard enough to leave a mark and says "hey knock it off, asshole", you say they're horrible and abusive.

    Do you see the distinction here?
     
    • Informative x 2
    • Witnessed x 2
  14. unknownanonymous

    unknownanonymous i am inimitable, i am an original|18+

    i didn't even know kintsugi had a discouragement flag until palin mentioned it
     
    • Agree x 4
  15. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    There was a general policy for "We announce what we're doing to the user".

    In that case, I do not see how I can feel safe discussing mental issues on a place you have control over. Is it possible to permanently delete my Caring Void threads? I understand the locked public vent thread might be, well, too public.
     
  16. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    And that is the fucking problem!
    I am honestly glad this has at least allowed me to get people to know the discouragement function exists and is (was) (is, lbr) used.
     
  17. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    Actually, the part that was relevant to said thread (that is the part Rigorist reacted to) was, in fact, the use of the discourage feature.
     
  18. palindromordnilap

    palindromordnilap Well-Known Member

    Also.
    No, there was no mod policy specifically about discouraging.
    Because discouraging was not included in what I was assuming to be the comprehensive list of moderation actions that would be considered.
     
  19. seebs

    seebs Benevolent Dictator

    Maybe some of them happened after, but... Literally, I did this in response to someone quoting you saying you were gonna troll through a thing looking for personal NSFW pictures. That was part of the harassment. You had already done that. The ongoing talk about murdering people had already happened. I don't know which order all the harassments happened in. Maybe some of them only happened later. Fuck if I know. But the harassment was an ongoing thing prior to any use of the discourage feature. Maybe you escalated even more, because you usually do. I think someone said you asked elsewhere why I didn't just tell you to slow down. Answer: Because you treat that, too, as an excuse to escalate. So far as I know, there is no sequence of words in any human language which will make Angry Alix stop making things worse.

    I don't see why you're reacting as though it's news to the general non-announcement of restrictions placed on users. That's been really clear since way long ago, and is a major part of why people were so mad that I wouldn't publically announce that I was restricting your actions. In general, I don't announce, as in "post publically where everyone can see it", that a given user's actions are in some way restricted. That doesn't mean I won't, usually, tell the user, or discuss it with them. The word "announce" is very different from "notify".

    And given how much of your recent communication has involved murder threats, no, I don't think we'll be "permanently deleting" anything. I haven't looked at the Caring Void threads, so I don't know what's in them, but whatever.
     
    • Informative x 2
  20. Existrum

    Existrum Member

    I recall a discussion a while back in which use of the discourage feature was brought up/suggested. I don’t remember whether it was ever stated that mods would or would not use the feature, but I imagine that because of the existence of the conversation it’s harder to know who is and isn’t aware that such a feature exists, and that the mods know of it.
     
    • Informative x 2
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice